|
author: Jim Slagle
Introductions
Hi everybody. To let you all know who I am: I'm a Ph.D. student at the Institute of Philosophy at the KUL, and I attend ICEL with my wife, 2-year-old son, and 1-month-old daughter. I became a Christian in my mid-20s after a concerted attempt to refute Christianity. I accidentally argued myself into it. This has resulted in my interest in apologetics, the defense of the faith, and one of the areas that fascinates me is faith-science issues.
I write a blog called Agent Intellect and also contribute to a group blog called Quodlibeta; both blogs often deal with issues surrounding faith and science. One of my co-bloggers at Quodlibeta is a historian of science, with a particular focus on its historical relation to Christianity. He has recently published a book, God's Philosophers: How the Medieval World Laid the Foundations of Modern Science. I compiled a list of my posts of interest that you can peruse here, and I'll probably be re-posting things from there on this site. |
|
One way that is still used to denigrate and mock Christianity, as well as the ancients and medievals, is the suggestion that, prior to Columbus, everyone thought the Earth was flat. This belief was rooted in religious dogma and was therefore unchallengeable until it was demonstrated empirically to be false; and even then many people continued to affirm it. It is held up as a primary example of the folly of religion in contrast to the wisdom of science.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
The Central Issue; or Location Isn't Everything |
Before Copernicus, everyone thought that the earth was immobile at the center of the universe, a concept called "geocentrism". Their grounds for this were pretty simple: we don't seem to be moving and everything else does; and everything else seems to be moving around us. Since people thought that everything revolves around us, they concluded that ... well ... everything revolves around us; that is, we are of central importance. This fits well with the biblical narrative, which makes the audacious claim that we have an intrinsic significance and value.
|
|
Read more...
|
One of the common claims regarding Christianity and science is that scientists have been put to death for their scientific discoveries when they conflicted with the Church's teachings. This turns out not to be the case: no one has ever been put to death for their scientific claims in Western Europe. Two people that are often brought forward are Hypatia of Alexandria and Giordano Bruno. Hypatia was recently the subject of a movie which portrayed her as a pagan scientist towards the tail end of the ancient world, who was murdered by Christians. The suggestion is that when Christianity took over, the Dark Ages began, "dark" because the Christians rejected science. This, however, ignores the fact that Hypatia's murder was entirely political in nature, not religious or scientific. Michael Flynn, the science-fiction author has recently written an excellent series on Hypatia entitled "The Mean Streets of Old Alexandria". Here are the links:
|
|
Read more...
|
|
(reposted from Agent Intellect)
It is well-known that people who lived before the Enlightenment were hopelessly superstitious. They believed, for example, that "odd" occurrences in the sky were omens signifying that odd occurrences would soon happen down here on Earth. The most blatant example of this took place when Halley's Comet appeared in 1456. While it was still visible, the siege of Belgrade by the Turks began; thus it was feared that this portent in the heavens had some relevance to the battle. Halley's Comet so upset Pope Callistus III that he resorted to drastic measures: he excommunicated it.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
I recently read Warranted Christian Belief by philosopher Alvin Plantinga. It's philosophy rather than science and religion, but in the last section of the book, he addressed several alleged "defeaters" of Christian belief. One of those he mentioned was historical-critical Bible scholarship. One type of such scholarship is Troeltschian biblical scholarship, which models itself on the physical sciences.
|
|
Read more...
|
One of the claims often made to illustrate how science has refuted Christianity is the size of the universe. The Bible teaches that the human race is so important to God that he sent his Son to Earth to die for us. But modern astronomy has shown us that the Earth is just an infinitely small speck in an infinitely large cosmos. How can we think we have any importance in light of this?
|
|
Read more...
|
In the Easter Sunday sermon, Phil mentioned Robert Jastrow, an agnostic physicist, and his book God and the Astronomers. Jastrow wrote this book in the late 1970s to summarize the reaction of astronomers and astrophysicists in the 20th century to the theological ramifications of Einstein's relativity equations and the subsequent Big Bang cosmologies...
|
|
Read more...
|
The idea that science and Christianity are at war with each other was very popular at the end of the 19th century. This position is called "the conflict thesis", ...
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |